Sinful Harvest: The Reaping and Marketing of Lies in the Field of JFK Assassination Inquiry
Charles R. Drago
12 Stephen Hopkins Court
Providence, RI 02904
E-mail: cdrago@rilin.state.ri.us
Conspiracy in the death of John F. Kennedy is historical truth. Despite sophistic philosophical and scientific constructs—negative epistemologies, if you will—designed as, and for the justification of the embrace of, ways of not knowing the attainable truth, common sense will not be denied.
Anyone with sufficient access to the evidence in the case of the murder of JFK who does not conclude that that crime was the result of a criminal conspiracy is intellectually deficient, morally bankrupt and/or complicit in the crime.
The conspiracy/no conspiracy debate was settled before the echoes of gunfire had subsided in Dealey Plaza. Anyone who would endeavor to prolong that debate may be described in terms used in the previous paragraph.
The only morally defensible actions in the wake of acceptance of the basic truth are: (1) further investigation of the crime in order to identify the responsible parties and their motives; (2) definition, pursuit and attainment of justice; (3) moral (and other) support of those engaged in actions 1 and 2.
We are at war with the murderers of John F. Kennedy. Neutrality in this war is not an option. There can be no honor extended to the enemy.
Numbered among the enemy are those who accept the truth of conspiracy, and then, motivated by ignorance, ego and/or venality, take actions that aid and abet the murderers.
The JFK investigation has been encumbered by misplaced allegiances and the pursuit of straw men from day one.
Examples of all the above will be offered.
A final question will be asked: Which side are YOU on?