JFK's real assassins conspired in Winnipeg Airport: theorist

by Lindor Reynolds, Winnipeg Free Press Columnist
Winnipeg Free Press, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
November 22, 2000 

    John Bevilaqua is a conspiracy theorist, a man determined to unearth the real killer or killers of John F. Kennedy.
    The Web site developer not only believes Lee Harvey Oswald was a fall guy, he also believes the key to the conspiracy lies in Winnipeg.
    It's a strange story that has tenuous roots in reality, anchored by countless pages of supporting documents and computer files that Bevilaqua, 53, uses to support his passionate argument that "The Winnipeg Airport Incident" points to the real killer or killers. Express an interest in the topic and you will be bequeathed a mountain of faxes, emails and relevant Web sites.
    Kennedy was shot dead in Dallas 37 years ago today. Thousands of Kennedy buffs, ranging from serious academic researchers to the sort of people who also want to prove that Elvis lives, have spent time speculating on who killed him and why.
    "I guess you could call me a mild obsessive-compulsive," says the affable Bevilaqua from his Rhode Island office. "I guess for the past nine years I've spent about 10 per cent of my waking hours on this." 
    His wife tolerates his obsession, he says.
    "When she asks me to do the dishes, I'll say, "Honey, I'm on the trail of the assassins," he laughs.
    "The Winnipeg Airport Incident" is also known as "The Richard Giesbrecht Incident." It is important to note that neither name appears in the majority of the legions of books published on the Kennedy assassination. It reigns only on the Internet, safe haven for conspiracy theorists of all stripes. But Bevilaqua is positive that an ordinary Winnipeg accountant (sic), accidentally overheard a conversation between the real killersor at least the men who hired the killers. 
    On February 13, 1964, Richard Elvin Giesbrecht was having a drink in the Horizon Room at the Winnipeg airport. Giesbrecht, then 35 and the father of four, overheard three men discussing what appeared to be their involvement in Kennedy's assassination. In his later report to the RCMP and the FBI, Giesbrecht said the men appeared knowledgeable about the murder. He jotted notes while they talked, carefully detailed their appearance and later told officials he felt threatened by the presence of one of the man.
    It could have been dismissed as the imagination of a mid afternoon drinker, but wasn't. Giesbrecht was eventually asked to testify at the New Orleans conspiracy trial of Clay Shaw, a businessman charged with conspiracy to murder Kennedy. In the end, the Winnipeg man's story was rejected by authorities. His claims received wide media attention. 
    Giesbrecht died in 1990. Today his widow, Nadia, refuses to talk about her husband's brush with fame. "My husband has passed away and so has the story.", she said this week. 
    Bevilaqua isn't about to let the story die.
    "I think the killing was the work of The Pioneer Fund, a right-wing organization," he says. "One hundred times, yes, I think they were behind it."
    He believes the three men in the airport bar were Rev. Gerald L. K. Smith, whom he calls "a Nazi sympathizer"; Anastase "Annie" Vonsiatsky, a German-American once sentenced to five years in prison for violation of The Espionage Act; and either Ronald A. Gostick or Patrick J. Walsh, both allegedly extreme right-wingers. They were in Winnipeg, Bevilaqua believes, to attend a meeting of the Canadian Anti-Communist League.
    "This story has unfortunately been relegated to a very, very small footnote in history," he says. "There are a number of us who believe (the) Richard Giesbrecht (Incident) holds the key."
    As for Lee Harvey Oswald, the man who took the official blame for the murder, Bevilaqua says he was likely a trained assassin who was selected to go down for the murder. The conspiracy theorist says that if Oswald pulled the trigger, "he was acting under hypnotic suggestion."
    The Richard Giesbrecht Incident could be truth, fiction or, more likely, some muddy combination. For John Bevilaqua, it's an historical fact he is determined to prove. It's been 37 years but he's still trying.

Back to John Bevilaqua