Subj:  Euins Initial Statement		Section: 
  To:  Jean Davison, 72733,3516		Tuesday, January 10, 1995 6:11:49 PM
From:  					

Jean, try to pay attention. The one specific issue this time was Hank's 
statement, a deliberate mispresentation of the facts for which you praise 
him, that Underwood never talked to Euins, but only overhead what Euins 
said to Harkness. I was pointing out that at least David Belin was honest 
enough to include Underwood's testimony which made it clear that 
Underwood HAD indeed talked to Euins. Hank claimed that Underwood 
never did talk to Euins. Underwood's WC testimony clearly states that he 
asked Euins not just once, but twice if Euins had said that the man was 
colored. Whether you agree with Underwood's recollection months later, 
the fact is that his WC testimony is that he talked to Euins. Hank said that 
Underwood had not talked to Euins. Do you get it yet???

Hank made a deliberate misrepresentation of what is in the WC 
testimony and you praise him for it. Do I need any more proof?


Tony