> > Yes, I have TKOAP and Trask. Yes, I believe you are looking at Bond 3.
> > You should be able to see that Jackie is NOT holding anything in her
> > left hand. Her palm is down and almost parallel to the ground. You can
> > see a black edge just to the right of Connally's neck. I believe the
> > white object you see is in the background, on Houston Street.
> > Now, would you believe that there is actually some wacko who goes around
> > in the newsgroups and puts out the story that this photo proves that
> > Jackie is WEARING Lambchop on her left hand amusing her husband. One
> > important analytical technique which should be used, which this other
> > guy NEVER does, is to compare the suspect photo to another photo taken
> > from another angle at about the same time or other photos taken just
> > before or after the suspect photo. When you do that, you can see for
> > yourself that Jackie was not WEARING Lambchop and she was not holding
> > anything in her left hand. If you turn the page and look at page 13, you
> > can very clearly see that Jackie is not WEARING Lamchop or holding
> > anything in her left hand as the limo turns onto Houston, only a few
> > second before Bond #3 was taken. You can clearly see every finger on her
> > cloved hand. None of this solves the problem of what we are seeing above
> > her hand in Bond #3, but unless you believe that Lambchop could suspend
> > itself in midair (especially against 15 MPH winds), then you have to
> > consider the very likely possibility that the object was in the
> > background, perhaps associated with the man wearing the hat on the
> > sidewalk. I have not seen any good explanation of that. But I am sure
> > that Jackie was NOT wearing Lambchop, nor was she holding him up.
> > If you want to see what the Chrysanthemums looked like in the back seat,
> > take a look at the cover photo from the book Four Days:
> 
> HEY...THAT LOOKS AS MUCH LIKE LAMBCHOP AS FLOWERS. I WOULD HAVE TO SAY A
> BIG **INCONCLUSIVE**!
> 
> JW