Path: newsfeed.intelenet.net!lsanca1-snf1!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!howland.erols.net!peerfeed.news.psi.net!portc01.blue.aol.com!portc01.blue.cs.com!audrey03.news.cs.com!not-for-mail
From: mlcranor@cs.com (MLCRANOR)
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy.jfk
Subject: SHACKELFORD'S WONDERFUL LIE
Lines: 17
NNTP-Posting-Host: ladder06.news.cs.com
X-Admin: news@cs.com
Date: 03 Oct 1999 17:47:24 GMT
Organization: CompuServe (http://www.compuserve.com/)
Message-ID: <19991003134724.22462.00000152@ng-fa1.news.cs.com>
Xref: newsfeed.intelenet.net alt.conspiracy.jfk:221039

Dear Reader,

Martin Shackelford wants you to believe my review of "Six Seconds in Dallas" is
based on new revelations.

(1)  You will not find one single criticism about that book that is based on
new information.   ALL of my comments are based on what Thompson knew at the
time -- and what he did about it.    Read my review, and you will see only part
of why Vincent Salandria considers Thompson part of the cover-up.

(2)  I only mentioned the new revelations in the context of Thompson's
CONTINUOUS claims that there is no proof of a conspiracy.

(3)  Shackelford has unwittingly proven of what many of us have known about him
for a long time.   Before his lies disappear, before he revises them, please
read them, and note the contrast between (a) his claims about my article, and
(b) the article itself.    I am very grateful to Martin for making it so plain