Time after time after time you have taken a position, then I have pointed out that you are wrong, yet you argue vociferously that I am wrong, then about 3 months later you admit that you got it 100% wrong. That will be the case with this issue also. Again, it is a simple fact that using a telephoto lens makes the subject look BIGGER and CLOSER to the camera than the normal lens. That is why your comparisons between your normal lenses and the Zapruder telephoto lens are comparing apples and oranges. You tell the viewer to note the size of your head in the picture you took as if it is somehow comaparable to the head seen in Z-413. What you forget is that the size of your head will look smaller when you shoot it with a normal lens than if you shot it with a telephoto lens as Zapruder was using. I have challenged you 4 or 5 times to duplicate your photos using a telephoto lens in addition to the normal lens. but you refuse to accept the challenge. If you would just shoot a few test shots for yourself comparing anything with a normal lens to a telephoto lens you would see that the telephoto lens makes the object look BIGGER and CLOSER to the camera than the normal lens. Why is it that I am the ONLY person in this discussion who knows this basic fact about photography? What does that say about the qualifications of the other people who are trying to debate the Zapruder film? One guy didn't even know what a sprocket hole is!