The rational thinker versus the paranoid
Presented with the same evidence for a mystery, the rational thinker and the paranoid respond very differently.
The rational thinker |
The paranoid |
|
1. Checks the evidence carefully and doesn’t rely on uncertain evidence |
1. Grabs onto a few pieces of evidence and defends them inflexibly. |
|
2. Doesn’t care which evidence he must let go. |
2. Seemingly irrationally seizes onto something and won’t let go. |
|
3. Seeks a realistic answer in simple and familiar processes. |
3. Invokes complex, unrealistic scenarios controlled by powerful forces behind the scenes. |
|
4. Accepts only what he can critically assess (falsifiable ideas). |
4. Deals in explanations that can never be critically assessed (unfalsifiable theories). |
|
5. Is willing to live with unresolved explanations for long periods. |
5. Demands quick, even immediate explanations. |
|
6. Accepts the roles of chance and human foibles. |
6. Invents scenarios when nothing ever goes wrong. |
|
7. Uses same rational approach in the rest of his life. |
7. Approaches many other “events” in the same irrational, paranoid way. (i.e., both people are consistent across their lives.) |
|
8. Finds empowering explanations. |
8. Feels powerless before these huge forces (victims). |
|
9. Accepts all demonstrated evidence. |
9. Will not face evidence that destroys his theory. |
|
10. Is willing to live with some fraction of unexplained or contradictory evidence. |
10. Insists on fitting everything into his explanation, often by explaining difficult items as further evidence of conspiracy. |
|
11. Tries to keep everything in proportion. |
11. Often seizes single pieces of evidence and blows them out of proportion. |
|
12. Will change ideas a new evidence emerges. |
12. Sticks to preconceived notion regardless of new evidence. |
|
13. Open, flexible, empowered, strong. |
13. Preconceived, rigid, victimlike, cowardly. |