What the Kennedy case is really all about

 

The epistemology was too easy.

      • Not as hard as I had expected.
• Not the major accomplishment I thought it would be.
• Too obvious, once I started it.
• Clearly the safest and surest path to the central truth of the assassination.

What the Kennedy case is not all about.

      • Logic and reason.
• Who can assemble the most “facts.”
• Who can probe the deepest into the newly released records.
• Who can hold the most conferences.
• Who can interview the most eyewitnesses.
• Who can publish the most articles.
• Who can mobilize the most citizen researchers.

The Kennedy case is really all about something else altogether, something that lives on in spite of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

   • A strange, amorphous blend of:

      Predisposition (prejudice)
Closed minds
Inability to think and reason objectively
Unwillingness to think and reason objectively
Unwillingness to let go and accept the obvious absence of evidence for conspiracy

   • It is about the combination of

      Extreme prejudgment about the answer, and
Extreme inability or unwillingness to think straight.
Not a nice combination!

   • IOW, it is about:

      Who we are
How we think (or don’t)
How our emotions can override our reason

 

Back to Epistemology