•11/28/2003, aaj: “What
Ken cannot deny is that his
entire case rests upon an edifice of junk science. Without any primary sources, without any background in the statistical arguments being brought against the entire science as a whole, Larry and Ken have put forth a contrived scenario where Oswald had the unfortunate luck of choosing the only known brand of bullets “exempted” form the National Academy of Sciences report.”
•7/06/2004, aaj: “Ken
knows full well that his own analysis
flies completely in the face of the last 10 years of best-practice in the area of Comparative Bullet Lead Analysis.”