 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • |
11/28/2003, aaj:
“What Ken cannot deny is that
|
|
|
his entire
case rests upon an edifice of junk
|
|
|
science.
Without any primary sources, without
|
|
|
any background
in the statistical arguments
|
|
|
being brought
against the entire science as a
|
|
|
whole, Larry
and Ken have put forth a contrived
|
|
|
scenario
where Oswald had the unfortunate luck
|
|
|
of choosing
the only known brand of bullets
|
|
|
“exempted”
form the National Academy of
|
|
|
Sciences
report.”
|
|
|
| • |
7/06/2004, aaj: “Ken
knows full well that his own
|
|
|
analysis
flies completely in the face of the last 10
|
|
years of
best-practice in the area of Comparative
|
|
Bullet Lead
Analysis.”
|
|