 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • |
11/30/2003, aaj: “Don’t
you think the argument
|
|
|
that Ken and
Larry are positing—that Oswald
|
|
|
chose the only
known bullets immune from the
|
|
|
charges
against Comparative Bullet Lead
|
|
|
Analysis as a
whole—is incredibly contrived and
|
|
|
should be
treated with great skepticism?”
|
|
| • |
11/26/2003, aaj: “Oswald
was really unlucky in
|
|
|
choosing the
only ammunition known to man
|
|
|
that CBLA can
apply to. They know this because
|
|
Larry
Sturdivan, without any primary
|
|
|
documentation
or confirmation from a
|
|
|
metallurgist,
has speculated about a
|
|
|
hypothetical
vat and reverse engineered to get
|
|
|
bullets that
fit his conclusion. Very solid science
|
|
|
there.”
|
|