 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| • |
There is no
reason to invoke the lognormal
|
|
|
distribution,
but that is the default distribution
|
|
|
used in the NRC
report and by the Iowa State
|
|
|
group.
|
|
| • |
There is no
primary documentation for the
|
|
|
unusual
properties of the WCC/MC vats, but that
|
|
is belied by
actual data on within-bullet
|
|
|
heterogeneities.
|
|
| • |
Guinn’s
reputation is “down the toilet,” but the
|
|
|
NRC panel
disagrees.
|
|
| • |
CABL is failed
science, but the NRC panel
|
|
|
disagrees.
|
|
| • |
Larry’s
statistics are flawed, but they follow
|
|
|
simply and
straightforwardly from the clear
|
|
|
lognormal
distribution.
|
|