FROM:	Gary L. Aguilar, 73653,2623
TO:	Anthony Marsh, 72127,2301
CC:	Gary Aguilar, 73653,2623
	Bob Artwohl, 71712,2151
	Lisa Pease (on Artwohl), INTERNET:lpease@netcom.com
	STEVE N. BOCHAN, 74273,3457
	Frank S. DeBenedictis, 72040,2426
	Mary Ferrell, 76450,706
	G. Alan Trimble, M.D., 75530,3456
	Barb Junkkarinen, 74754,2302
	David S. Lifton, 72303,2702
DATE:	6/15/95 1:12 AM

Re:	AMA blows it - again

The following message has scrolled from Political Debate Forum.

 #: 363765 S7/JFK Debate
    02-Jun-95 06:37:47
Sb: AMA blows it - again
Fm: Anthony Marsh [72127,2301]
To: Gary L. Aguilar [73653,2623]

What happened to Artwohl's hint at the Chicago conference that they had
more dirt on Crenshaw?

Tony



Dear Tony,

Re: Your ? on Artwohl's dire warning on Crenshaw at Chicago - I don't know 
what 'else' they had on Crenshaw, if anything. As bad a source as Crenshaw 
may be, he's far more reliable than the fools the AMA quoted attacking him, 
as I've shown by quoting their various versions of the 'truth' Baxter, 
Jenkins, Peters, et al have put forward. 

I suggest we ask Artwohl. He still has a CServe address, does he not?

Gary

PS The AMA got Shires quote very wrong in its response to Crenshaw, and in 
a tendentious way. Perhaps Arwhohl will explain how Shires word, "missile" 
was mistaken for "wound" in JAMA's latest invention of the Warren 
Commission. This type of silly nonsense is typical of the AMA's research on 
JFK I'm afraid.

PPS Lets see if Artwohl answers us, or whether he's 'sworn to secrecy' in 
his dedication to help Breo confront the 'defamers of the truth', i.e. 
those who would distort  Warren Commission testimony to make Shires' 
irrelevant point conclusive refutation of Crenshaw. I believe Artwohl is 
too beholdin' to Lundberg to ever break ranks and demur, and, hence, he's 
fled the scene to save his crediblilty, or what's left of it. 

PPPS. You may find Weisberg's latest book of interest with respect to 
Artwohl. Weisberg tells the tale that Dr. Malcolm Perry of Parkland told 
him the throat wound had the characteristic bruising of an entrance wound 
"as they always do". Weisberg never sold out, and continues to report 
Perry's privately revealed comment that, whether true or not, Perry 
originally believed the throat wound was an entrance wound - AND CONTINUED 
IN THAT BELIEF WELL AFTER THE WARREN COMMISSION DISSOLVED.

 Artwohl spoke to Perry in 1986 and reported on Prodigy that Perry told 
him, physician to physcian, the throat wound was an entrance wound - an 
opinion he later abandoned when put under the public gun by the AMA. Now 
Artwohl will claim that Artwohl's unambiguous assertion to him in '86 was 
'overinterpreted' or 'overzealous' or some such nonsense - as if in '86 
Artwohl was incapable of understanding clear statements from a fellow 
physician. Now Artwohl insists Perry expressed no firm opinion in'86 about 
the nature of JFK's throat wound. 

So, amazingly, on 11/22/63 at a press conference, to Weisberg privately in 
the 70's, and again in '86 to Artwohl privately, Perry 'knew' the throat 
wound was an entrance wound. But for the record, with the AMA breathing 
down his neck, Perry forgets and claims he had no firm opinion about the 
throat wound - entrance or exit. And of course all of this is not in the 
least peculiar to Artwohl. Not in the least. FASCINATING!