Two defining questions
Question 1
Why, 35 years after the assassination, does a fierce debate continue to rage concerning conspiracy versus a lone gunman, with each side remaining unable to convince the other?
Question 2
Why do conspiracy theorists continue to advance nearly as many conspiracy theories as there are theorists, again with no particular point of view prevailing?
The stakes
If you can answer these questions defensibly, you know two of the most important results of PSC482G. (A third important result deals with how to handle the first results.)